I think that looking into the different ways of reducing bit depth - truncation (yech!) dither & various types of noise shaping - will make a more noticeble difference.
and not notice much (if any) improvement. You can spend an awful lot of money on a stand alone sample rate converter, software plug-ins etc. Some of the big name pros have come out in favor of going from 96k to 44.1 by using high quality converters (costing thousands per channel) to convert to analog and then back to digital at the new sample rate.īottom line: unless you're hearing a noticeble degradation in sound quality when converting, leave it alone.
How bad does the result sound to you? How much money are you willing to spend to get better results? I use the Apogee UV22 noise shaping to reduce the word length (24bit to 16bit) and the sample rate conversion in the Alesis Masterlink to go from high sample rates to 44.1.
0 kommentar(er)
